Exciting news! Yardstick is becoming Meazure Learning. You can continue browsing getyardstick.com for now, but all public content will be migrated to MeazureLearning.com by the end of 2021. Don't worry, we'll automatically redirect you where you need to be.
Exciting news! Yardstick is becoming Meazure Learning. You can continue browsing getyardstick.com for now, but all public content will be migrated to MeazureLearning.com by the end of 2021. Don't worry, we'll automatically redirect you where you need to be.

What Happens When Online Exams Go Unsupervised?


Yardstick Assessment Strategies | | Blog Articles | Share:  

A recent study published in the Journal of the National College Testing Association looked at student attitudes toward cheating in proctored and unproctored settings.

Read the full article here: https://ncta.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/JNCTA/2020%20-%20JNCTA%20-%20Academic%20Dishonesty%20and%20Testing.pdf

KEY FINDING:

“The results of this study indicate that students are more likely to engage in cheating behaviour in an unproctored environment, as hypothesized.”

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Participants reported viewing cheating in unproctored environments as acceptable more often than in proctored environments.
  • Researchers also found strong correlations between attitudes towards cheating and actual behaviour. Students who viewed certain behaviours as acceptable were more likely to report doing them.
  • 18% of open-ended responses reflected an attitude that test-takers should use all available resources in unproctored environments, including collaborating with others.
  • An additional theme found in the open-ended responses uncovered an attitude that examiners should proctor exams if they don’t want test-takers to use outside resources.
  • 78% of students surveyed have been encouraged to cheat on an exam.